By Irina Anderson, Kathy Doherty
Accounting for Rape provides an unique viewpoint just about rape, targeting either male and female sexual violence. The authors examine daily ideals approximately rape, to envision how blaming the sufferer and the normalization of rape are completed by means of humans in a dialogue approximately sexual violence. They synthesize discursive psychology and a feminist point of view to discover accurately how rape and rape victimhood are outlined in ways in which replicate the social, political and cultural stipulations of society.
By analysing conversational info, Anderson and Doherty recommend that the prevailing social mental experimental examine into rape and rape notion fails to examine the subtlety and political value of rape supportive reasoning. Accounting for Rape presents a severe interrogation of the dominant theories and methodologies, focusing on:
How the gender and sexual orientation of alleged sufferers and perpetrators is essential to social members whilst making experience of a rape record and in apportioning blame and sympathy
How arguments which are severe of alleged sufferers are inbuilt ways in which are 'face saving' for the contributors within the conversations, and the way victim-blaming arguments are provided as 'common sense'.
The strength of making use of this strategy in either expert and educational contexts to advertise angle change.
The e-book can be of significant curiosity to these learning social and medical psychology, cultural experiences, sociology, women's reports and conversation reviews.
Read or Download Accounting for Rape PDF
Similar feminism books
Having merely emerged long ago few many years, Feminist Philosophy is quickly constructing its personal thrust in parts of specific significance to feminism-and ladies extra generally-while additionally reevaluating and reshaping so much different fields of philosophy, from ethics to good judgment and Marxism to environmentalism. It attracts not just on feminist philosophers yet criticizes, approves, or appropriates the paintings of the prime philosophers of all instances.
She was once the 1st girl to handle the U. S. Congress, the 1st to function a brokerage company on Wall road, and the 1st to run for president. She's the girl Gloria Steinem known as "the so much debatable suffragist of all of them. " during this generally researched biography, journalist Mary Gabriel has written a complete account of 1 of yank history's most unique and engaging girls, who, in an period of Victorian morality, was once the loudest and so much radical voice for women's equality.
Some of the most talked-about books of final 12 months, the Pulitzer Prize-winning writer of Backlash now explores the cave in of conventional masculinity that has left males feeling betrayed. With Backlash in 1991, Susan Faludi broke new floor whilst she positioned her finger at once at the challenge bedeviling ladies, and the sunshine of popularity dawned on thousands of her readers: what's making ladies depressing isn't anything they're doing to themselves within the identify of independence.
In heavily! , Cynthia Enloe, writer of the groundbreaking research of globalization, Bananas, shorelines, and Bases, addresses deeply gendered and contested questions: who's taken heavily? And who will get to bestow the label serious” on others? With a technique of taking either ladies and gender dynamics heavily, Cynthia Enloe investigates the Dominique Strauss-Kahn affair and the banking crash of 2008, the next recession, in addition to UN peacekeeping and the continued Egyptian revolution.
- Undoing Gender
- Marxism, Liberalism, And Feminism (Leftist Legal Thought)
- Watching Women's Liberation, 1970: Feminism’s Pivotal Year on the Network News
- The Cambridge Companion to Feminist Theology (Cambridge Companions to Religion)
Additional info for Accounting for Rape
Thus, the hypothesis would predict that female observers would blame the rape victim less (on grounds of similarity as women), while male observers should blame female rape victims more. , 1994), but negative attributions to female victims by female observers (and by male observers to male victims ± Burt and DeMello, 2002) have also been reported. How can these ®ndings be explained? , 2004; Rempala and Bernieri, 2005) as the most relevant dimension of perceived similarity between observers and depicted victims.
In so doing, we question the extent to which there is or can be a comfortable (Ward, 1995) or `symbiotic' relationship between feminist scholarship and the social psychology of rape perception. We conclude that the rape-perception paradigm has substantial drawbacks for researchers interested in exploring the social de®nition of rape. This is because there is a lack of ®t between the precepts of liberal, psychological attribution theory and associated experimental methods and the research programme suggested by early feminist scholarship on the social de®nition of rape, where the signi®cance of the social construction of meaning in cultural and political context was placed centre stage.
Causal explanations of rape in feminist theory stress the signi®cance of normative cultural constructions of what it is to be a man, the fantasies and fears about `woman' and the dread of homosexuality that underpins misogyny in our culture, rather than pointing to the individual psychology of `deviant perverts' as is usual in more liberal theorising (Walby, 1990; Ussher, 1997). Feminist scholarship also emphasises that socially constructed, hegemonic, understandings of gender and heterosexuality (our everyday `sexual scripts' ± Gagnon and Simon, 1973) provide a framework of cultural norms for gendered behaviour, to which we are accountable.
Accounting for Rape by Irina Anderson, Kathy Doherty