New PDF release: Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law

By David E. Wilkins, K. Tsianina Lomawaima

ISBN-10: 0806133953

ISBN-13: 9780806133959

ISBN-10: 0806181850

ISBN-13: 9780806181851

Within the early Seventies, the government all started spotting self-determination for American Indian international locations. As sovereign entities, Indian countries were in a position to identify regulations referring to health and wellbeing care, schooling, spiritual freedom, legislation enforcement, gaming, and taxation. but those earnings haven't long gone unchallenged. beginning within the overdue Nineteen Eighties, states have attempted to control and make the most of on line casino playing on Indian lands. Treaty rights to seek, fish, and assemble stay hotly contested, and conventional non secular practices were denied defense. Tribal courts fight with nation and federal courts for jurisdiction. David E. Wilkins and ok. Tsianina Lomawaima speak about how the political rights and sovereign prestige of Indian countries have variously been revered, overlooked, terminated, and unilaterally changed by way of federal lawmakers a result of ambivalent political and criminal prestige of tribes below western legislation.

Show description

Read Online or Download Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law PDF

Similar native american studies books

Get Iroquois on Fire: A Voice from the Mohawk Nation (Native PDF

Of their homelands in what's now big apple nation, Iroquois and their matters have come to dominate public debate because the citizens of the area search how one can get to the bottom of the multibillion buck land claims opposed to the nation. This preliminary dispute over territorial name has grown to surround playing, treaties, taxation, and what it capability to say local sovereignty in an international experiencing outstanding technological switch.

Download PDF by David E. Wilkins, K. Tsianina Lomawaima: Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law

Within the early Nineteen Seventies, the government begun spotting self-determination for American Indian countries. As sovereign entities, Indian international locations were in a position to determine rules touching on health and wellbeing care, schooling, non secular freedom, legislations enforcement, gaming, and taxation. but those profits haven't long gone unchallenged.

Download PDF by Raymond J. DeMallie, Douglas R. Parks, Arthur Amiotte: Sioux Indian Religion: Tradition and Innovation

Participants of all persuasions became deeply attracted to modern Sioux non secular practices. those essays by means of tribal non secular leaders, students, and different individuals of the Sioux groups in North and South Dakota take care of the extra very important questions on Sioux ritual and trust relating to historical past, culture, and the mainstream of yankee lifestyles.

Extra info for Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law

Example text

In the case of Tee-Hit-Ton v. United States, 348 US. 272 (1955), the discovery principle was used to deny THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY 23 indigenous nations any legal title to their lands. Tee-Hit-Ton considered the legal standing of what has been termed ”aboriginal title,” a term that assumes that indigenous nations ”owned” their lands in a way that European law could acknowledge through its notion of “title,” meaning the written documents recording land boundaries. In other words, can tribes be considered legal landowners, in the sense of possessing a recognized title?

If European nationsand the United Stateshad not recognized the necessity of negotiation, the important extant treaty legacy of THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY 27 each of these states with tribal nations would not have evolved to the degree it did. As Robert A. Williams, an Indian legal scholar, shows in his recent study, ”in the seventeenthand eighteenth century Encounter era, European colonists often found themselves outnumbered and outflanked with a bare foothold on the North American continent. During much of this period, whites in their small colonial settlements were not the dominant power on the continent.

The historical evidence cited above does not support his contentions. Scholars such as Dorothy Jones (1982), also a historian, paint a more realistic picture. By the postrevolutionary period the United States was forced to acknowledge that it had a curtailed sovereignty because tribes had preexisting territorial rights. More evidence to corroborate a restricted, preemptive definition of the discovery principle is found in a September 27,1792, treaty of peace and friendshipbetween the Wabash and Illinois tribes and the United States.

Download PDF sample

Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law by David E. Wilkins, K. Tsianina Lomawaima

by Joseph

Rated 5.00 of 5 – based on 9 votes